Extraordinary ability has to be documented. We build the documentation.

Petitions live or die on documented, independent recognition: published material about you, authorship of scholarly and professional articles, original contributions recognized by others, media coverage, evidence you have judged the work of peers. Adjudication has tightened, and vague or thinly documented accomplishment now draws the most scrutiny. Most candidates have the substance and lack the record: years of real work, none of it published, cited, or independently visible. Attorneys say "you need more published material and independent recognition" and have nowhere to send you. This is where we work.

A published body of work under your byline on your own domain, structured, dated, and attributable: essays arguing your original contributions, a flagship reference piece on your core territory, placements and press that constitute material about you rather than by you, and a citation trail across AI engines and search that demonstrates field recognition. Everything is mapped against the criteria your attorney is arguing, on a content calendar aligned to your filing date, and delivered with provenance documentation: recordings, drafts, and approvals showing the thinking is yours.

Your counsel owns the petition strategy; we produce evidence to their map. We join one call with your attorney at the start, align the calendar to the filing timeline, and hand over a documented exhibit set: published URLs, archived copies, dates, and the provenance file. RFE timelines get priority scheduling.

You are already spending $10,000 to $20,000 or more on counsel, against a deadline, where a denial costs years, status, and sometimes a company. A six-month Authority sprint runs about $14,600 all-in and materially strengthens three or more criteria. Price it against the cost of filing thin.